| . |
George
W. Reid
Some
sincere Christians wonder whether creating statuary is not a violation
of the second of the Ten Commandments. Does this commandment recognize
or does it ignore the distinction between art for its own sake and art
for a religious purpose? And could there be art for a religious purpose
that is acceptable to God? Because the Ten Commandments represent the
core moral law and express the will of God answering such questions is
of importance.
The
underlying question deals with the second commandment. There God told
the Israelites not to make graven images, specifically in the setting
that they might bow down to them or worship them. Egypt, which they had
fled, was filled with statuary of the gods. The Lord was saying to the
Hebrews, "Do not do that kind of thing." His concern was clearly with
the temptation to use images as worship aids. To create an image of the
mighty and eternal Lord would distort their understanding of His majesty
and reduce him in human understanding. God is invisible to humans and
should be worshiped as the invisible ruler of the universe. The Egyptians
also believed that their gods were living and invisible, but required
statuary to remind the people of the hidden gods. God is saying to the
Hebrews, do not in any way make worship of me dependent on artistic worship
aids. Worship me directly, from the heart.
It
is clear that this prohibition of statuary as a worship aid was not intended
to exclude all kinds of art work outside the worship mode, as is claimed
by Muslims. Evidence of this is found in God's instructions for building
the tabernacle, and later the temple. The original laver that stood in
the courtyard where the priests would wash was expanded in Solomon's temple
to a much larger "sea of bronze, its perimeter being 30 cubits (about
14 meters), resting on the backs of twelve bronze oxen (1 Kings 7:23-26).
Even in the place of worship where God met with His people, it was legitimate
to have functional statuary, but not to be used as objects or aids to
worship. And we have other examples. The great curtains that hung in the
tabernacle separating the holy place from the court, and a second one
between the holy and most holy apartments had the figures of angels woven
into the fabric (Ex 26:1). Even more, at either end of the mercy seat,
the lid covering the holy ark of the covenant, an image of an angel was
placed (Ex 25:18-22). These were, of course, out of sight of the worshipers
but they knew of their presence. The people were to worship God alone,
never the angels. Worship of angels, even though they stand in the very
presence of God, is specifically forbidden in the Scriptures (Rev. 19:10,
Isa. 6:10).
Beyond
the tabernacle itself, we have an instance where God instructed Moses
to make a brazen (actually bronze) image of a serpent in the wilderness
(Num 21:8, 9), which in later centuries came to be worshiped by the Hebrews,
leading Hezekiah to curb the idolatry by destroying the image (2 Kings
18:4). Clearly, it was not the making of the image that was offensive
to God, but the misuse of that image.
Based
on these Scriptures, we conclude that use of artistic decoration, including
statuary, even in places of worship, is not in violation of the second
commandment as long as it is not used in any format for worship. We need
to think of these things in terms of art, not worship aids as is common
in Roman Catholic practice, and not to incorporate them into our worship.
God is a lover of beauty, of which we have many evidences, and we should
bring Him the best of our gifts, whether music, paintings, or other gifts
of skill, but never objects of worship.
The
biblical approach to art in non-worship settings is described in the passages
cited in this brief article. Because early Christians were viewed by the
authorities as an illicit sect, and at times their lives were in peril,
it was not until many decades later that they dared erect church buildings
for worship. Those buildings were relatively simple and hardly ornamented
at all.
Among
the earliest places of Christian worship still in existence are the catacombs
underneath the city of Rome, where Christians, operating under the rubric
of burial societies for the dead, worshiped God in underground chambers
and narrow hallways cut in the relatively soft tufa formations. There
they left wall inscriptions and simple painted symbols, best known being
that of the fish, as well as paintings on biblical themes and representations
of the dead persons buried in wall crypts. Following legal recognition
of Christianity in the Roman Empire in 313, church buildings rapidly appeared,
increasingly ornamented with artistic worship aids that themselves became
the objects of devotion. In this the works of art passed from secular
and commemorative uses into objects assigned religious significance. At
that point they came into clear violation of the second commandment.
Christians
committed to biblical teachings and practices will keep clear the distinction
between artwork as art and artwork as the object of religious devotion.
The distinction is that illustrated in Hezekiah's destruction of the brazen
serpent. Although it carried an impeccable heritage, having been prepared
at the explicit command of God, its use descended to became the object
of idolatry by a people whose religion had drifted from a personal walk
with God to one of ritualistic honor lavished on an antiquity.
|
. |