Gordon M. Hyde
[The
following article reporting an action of the Annual Council of 1970, was
originally published in THE MINISTRY, July, 1971, [329] 41 [330] 42, and
was made available as a reprint. Due to changes in nomenclature, this
revision of November, 1975, is now made available to the world field.]
"How
can I make my views known to the church at large?" is a question asked
from time to time by members and also by workers in the Seventh-day Adventist
Church. In these days of dialog and mass communication there is an increasing
desire on the part of members and ministers to communicate to the church
various theological views.
In
principle it has ever been the spirit and genius of the Advent Movement
to keep the lines of communication open throughout the body, of which
Jesus Christ is the Head. The handing down of dogma is contrary to the
pioneering spirit and experience of the movement.
As an evidence that it is still the
intent of the church to keep the channels of communication open, the reader
is referred to the "Suggested Procedures for Hearings on Theological Questions
Requested by Members of the Church." (These same procedures are adaptable
to the needs of a worker.)
In answer to the occasionally expressed
sentiment that the leadership of the world church tends to pontificate,
these procedures are intended to clarify the fact that the responsibility
for hearing and evaluating theological views rests primarily with the
local field leadership of the church, for there is no disposition at world
headquarters to give the slightest encouragement to the concept that an
oracle exists at Takoma Park!
Since these procedures involve ministers
and conference administrators, it is urged that they be studied carefully
for their implications and field for future reference.
Sometimes those who have a burden
to get the ear of the church tend to leapfrog over the intervening levels
of church organization in an attempt to obtain the ear of the General
Conference. As we become sensitive to the function of the proposed procedures
we should guide such persons to the beginning of the procedural structure
and urge them to take the first step first. These procedures are designed
to preserve the channels of communication for those views that seriously
merit careful consideration.
A careful reading of the "Objectives"
enunciated at the beginning of these procedures will provide the worker
with the philosophy that has guided in their development.
It is the earnest prayer of the Biblical
Research Institute that these procedures, adopted throughout the world
field, will prove a strength to the cause of God and may preserve for
the church all rays of true light from the Lord that may come to any of
us.
Suggested
Procedures for Hearings on Theological Questions
Requested by Members of the Church
The
Resident Administrative Committee of the Biblical Research Institute recommends
a procedure whereby a church member may present his views on doctrinal
and exegetical matters to "brethren of experience" for counsel, in harmony
with the admonition of the Spirit of Prophecy in Testimonies, vol. 5,
p. 293, and Counsels to Writers and Editors, pp. 43-51.
Objectives
These
procedures are intended to assist in the accomplishment of the following
objectives:
1.
To demonstrate that the church will welcome the opportunity to examine
"new light."
2.
To ensure to the individual church member the right, the channels, and
the assurance of all reasonable speed in bringing his views to the church
for consideration.
3. To set reasonable limits on the
possibility that minor matters command the major attention of the church.
4. To demonstrate confidence in the
wisdom which God bestows upon all levels of the church's organization.
Procedures
1.
A church member desiring to present his views to the church is invited
to review them with his church or district pastor. If the pastor or the
member feels the need of wider counsel, the pastor will forward the member's
written presentation to the local conference or mission president. (In
the case of persons employed by a denominational institution, the forwarding
might well be done by the head of the institution.)
2. The conference or mission president
may deal with the matter himself, provided that it is to the satisfaction
of the church member, or he will arrange to submit the matter to an ad
hoc committee of experienced Bible students (remembering the availability
of trained theologians at our educational institutions). The matter would
be presented to the committee members in written form, and a decision
to call them together as a committee to study the matter, or to hear the
church member in person, would hinge upon the reaction received from the
readers of the presentation.
3. Should the previous steps fail
to satisfy the member presenting his views or the brethren taking the
view under advisement, he or they will request the conference president
to report the matter to the union conference president for a comparable
consideration at the union level. (In counsel with the union conference
president, the local conference president might merge steps 2 and 3, carrying
the matter to the union level at the outset.)
4. Depending upon the involvement
and seriousness of the views presented, and the satisfaction of those
involved in the hearings to this point, the union conference president
in turn may direct the matter to the division president for comparable
consideration.
5. Only after such steps in the process
have been completed will the division president forward the matter to
the General Conference for the attention of the Biblical Research Institute.
In such instances, the member's presentation and the findings and recommendations
from the several study groups will be forwarded to the director of the
Biblical Research Institute of the General Conference.
6. The Resident Administrative Committee
of the Biblical Research Institute will consider the matter and determine
whether and in what manner it should involve the membership of the Biblical
Research Institute.
7. The Biblical Research Institute
will present its findings to the General Conference President's Administrative
Council, which will determine whether to refer the findings to the General
Conference Committee. In either case there will be a report to all those
who have been concerned in presenting and hearing the matter previously.
8. As an evidence of good faith, the
church member making the presentation and all those hearing him throughout
the procedures are requested to refrain from any and all public discussions
of the points at issue, whether as to substance or procedure, and whether
orally or in writing. The committees and the church member are requested
during this time to refrain from publishing or circulating or causing
to be published or circulated any documents relating to the points at
issue or to the request for a hearing.
9. A member who, without a knowledge
of the above procedures, has published his views, shall have the right
to present his views, as set forth in the foregoing, for the fair consideration
of his situation and his views.
10. A disfellowshiped church member who wishes
to present his views to the church is advised first to exercise his right
to appeal for reinstatement as outlined in the Seventh-dal Adventist Church
Manual (1971 edition, pp. 70, 241, 242). Upon reinstatement he would follow
the procedures outlined above. Exceptions to the provisions of this paragraph
would be made at the discretion of the organization to which appeal is
made and would be based on the merits of the case.
11. Upon the completion of any step in the procedures
outlined above, the church member making the presentation has the right
of appeal for a review of the case by the next level of the church's organization.
Before making such appeal he is requested to consider prayerfully the
counsel given in Counsels to Writers and Editors, pp. 43-51.