![]() |
|||||||
| . | |||||||
|
|
||||||
| . | |||||||
When
studying the subject of salvation, we constantly encounter the terms justification
and sanctification. Whatever happens during these two transactions,
it is said to come about by faith. Faith is the means, the instrument.
In respect to this topic the message is clear: without faith nothing can
happen! So this first study will examine the questions What is faith?
And what does it mean "to believe"? The Objective
Dimension The Subjective
Dimension Faith and
Obedience The Obedience
of Faith Faith and
Hope
|
|||||||
|
The Glorious Commencement of Our Walk With God |
| We who are Jews by birth and not 'Gentile sinners' know that a man is not justified by observing the law, but by faith in Jesus Christ. So we, too, have put our faith in Christ Jesus that we may be justified by faith in Christ and not by observing the law. (Gal 2:15, 16) |
In
this passage Paul presents justification by faith as the good news that
God accepts sinful men and women into fellowship with Himself. They are
no longer strangers or aliens. And not because of their pious deeds, impressive
credentials, or natural goodness, but simply because they have looked
to Jesus Christ and have trustfully committed themselves to Him. They
have answered yes to His invitation to discipleship.
In the matter of salvation there are two basic indisputable
facts: (1) God is just, and (2) we are not. When we put these two factors
together, we see our dilemma. Paul writes: "There is none righteous, no,
not one" (Rom 3:10, KJV). And because we are unrighteous, we are strangers
to God, alienated from His presence, under the just sentence of death.
And so the urgent question is that of Bildad the Shuhite: "How then can
a man be righteous before God?" (Job 25:4). How can we be clean? Justified
we must be if we are to live, for in our natural state we stand
guilty and condemned.
Paul tells us how God does it-how He sets
us free: through faith (see Rom 3:28). It is a free gift, and
reflects God's graciousness to creatures who cannot save themselves. This,
says Scripture, is God's way of doing it. We are "justified freely by
his grace through the redemption that came by Christ Jesus" (verse 24).
This message was completely foreign to traditional
Judaism. The righteousness of Judaism was the "righteousness of the law";
if you keep it successfully, you will live. It's hard work. It's a struggle.
You'll have to flog yourself, but it's the only way. You must obey all
that the law says, and if you do this meticulously and flawlessly, you'll
make the grade, and God will accept you and reckon you worthy. Because
of your impressive scorecard God will declare you innocent.
This was the mind-set of traditional Judaism. And Paul
certainly had this erroneous concept in view when he spoke of some who
"did not know the righteousness that comes from God and sought to establish
their own" (Rom 10:3). Such self-centered striving is certainly doomed
to failure.
Traditional Judaism's view of justification and Paul's
understanding of it have one thing in common: both understand justification
to be a legal matter-forensic. For both it is a statement of
acquittal-a declaration by God that one is innocent.
But there are two significant differences between Paul
and traditional Judaism on this issue. The first we have already covered,
namely, that justification is a free gift. The second is that whereas
justification, in Judaism, is an entirely eschatological reality, for
Paul it is also a present experience. It begins to work already now-a
concept that should come easy for Seventh-day Adventists, given our knowledge
of the ongoing, present judgment in heaven. Paul says: "Since we have
been justified through faith, we have peace with God." "We have
gained access by faith into this grace in which we now stand."
"Since we have now been justified by his blood, how much more
shall we be saved from God's wrath through him!" (Rom 5:1, 2, 9).
So this gift of justification, or acquittal, is not
only legal "cover" for the future; it has impact on life as we
experience it here and now.
False Alternatives
In this matter of justification we are sometimes
confronted with options that some find troublesome:
When God justifies and declares us righteous, does
that say something about the ethical/moral qualities that God sees in
us? Does it imply that we are basically good and decent? Or is justification
simply a description of what God is going to do for us, in spite of what
He sees in us, simply because we have chosen to fix our eyes on Jesus
Christ? Is the justification of the sinner simply a legal acquittal, or
does it effect actual changes within?
Could it be that these are really false alternatives?-that
it is neither entirely one nor the other? Could it be both?
The word that the New Testament uses (dikaiosune)
and that we meet in English as "righteousness," "justification," "acquittal,"
and its verbal form diakaioo can be used also in an ethical sense
to mean "uprightness." But by and large it is used in a legal sense, as
it is when dealing with the basis or condition for salvation. It does
not describe the quality of the individual, but it describes the relationship
of the individual to God.
This legal meaning is what we find particularly expressed
in passages such as Romans 4:3 ("Abraham believed God, and it was credited
to him as righteousness") or Romans 4:5 ("To the man who does not work
but trusts God who justifies the wicked, his faith is credited as righteousness").
(Cf. Rom 2:13; Gal 3:6).
Ellen G. White made this telling observation: "The
great work that is wrought for the sinner who is spotted and stained by
evil is the work of justification. By Him who speaketh truth he is declared
righteous. The Lord imputes unto the believer the righteousness of Christ
and pronounces him righteous before the universe. He transfers
his sins to Jesus, the sinner's representative" (Selected Messages,
Book 1, p. 392; italics supplied).
This is something that God is ready to do. And justification
has to do with our relationship and our legal standing before God. Somehow,
wonderfully, we who are rightly guilty and deserve to die are being saved
by God who chooses to declare us not guilty! In the words of
Ellen White: "When God pardons the sinner, remits the punishment he deserves,
and treats him as though he had not sinned, He receives
him into divine favor, and justifies him through the merits of Christ's
righteousness" (ibid., p. 389; italics supplied).
However, we are not to think that God has gone soft
on sin. It is not sin that God justifies! The involvement of God in Jesus
Christ on the cross is sufficient answer to that. Christ died in my place
and satisfied the unchangeable requirements of the law of the universe
of God. Justification deals with people who are being brought into a right
relationship with God-with those who "hunger and thirst after
righteousness"; with those who know that they are guilty and who cry out
for help; with those who know that they are strangers and aliens and who
long to be united with God; with those who are crying out to God in the
name of Jesus Christ for a verdict in their favor.
Is It a Legal
Fiction?
Is justification merely a legal acquittal,
without any thought for simultaneous changes within?
I believe we make an infortunate mistake when we define
justification so narrowly as to make it mean only a legal declaration
of acquittal. I would suggest that passages of Scripture such as Romans
5:1-5 and Galatians 2:15-21 give a much more dynamic definition of the
concept. When a man is justified, he receives at the same time both the
imputed righteousness of Christ and the Holy Spirit into his heart. The
gracious gift by which salvation is a reality contains both.
Justification is by faith, without works (Rom 3:28). The gift of the Holy
Spirit is similarly by faith, without the works of the law (Gal 3:2, 5).
In Romans 5:1-5 these two are so linked that one cannot be present without
the other.
Therefore, notwithstanding the theoretical priority
we may give to justification, it constitutes one united experience with
that of the renewal brought by the presence of the Holy Spirit. Restoring
the relationship between God and man, which sin destroyed, is more than
just an objective legal declaration. It is dynamic, and affects
the complete life of the total person. In the judicial declaration of
acquittal the creative power of God does something to a person. A miracle
takes place. As the believer is acquitted, the creative powers of the
Almighty are released in the life, changes occur, and a new creature emerges.
John Stott reminds us: "Justification is not a legal
fiction in which a man's status is changed, while his character remains
untouched. Verse 17: We are 'justified in Christ.' That is, our
justification takes place when we are united to Christ by faith. And someone
who is united to Christ is never the same again. Instead, he is changed.
It is not just his standing before God which changed; it is he himself-radically,
permanently changed" (Only One Way, p. 65).
To imagine such a person going back again to live his
former life in sin is, in Paul's thinking, a contradiction in terms. It's
nonsense. Paul opens Galatians 5 with the words "It is for freedom that
Christ has set us free [that's acquittal]. Stand firm, then, and do not
let yourselves be burdened again by a yoke of slavery." In verse 16 he
describes the new life in the Spirit into which the justified person enters.
A New Creation
This new life is one in which the creative
power of God, released in justification, causes a new creation to emerge.
In talking about this newness, he uses such terms as death and
resurrection, as he does in Romans 6, with the strong ethical
imperative Live therefore a new life! The same point is made
in Galatians 2:19, 20: I now live a new life! "Therefore, if
anyone is in Christ, he is a new creation; the old has gone, the new has
come!" (2 Cor 5:17).
Having met the arguments of the critics, Paul now gives
in Galatians 2:21 his final forceful argument: The Christian message is
the gospel of God's grace in Jesus Christ. Its focus is the cross. If
it were possible to be right with God through discipline, lawkeeping,
or education, then the cross was ultimately unnecessary and the Christian
faith is vain. But the message of the Christian faith is clear: Salvation
comes to us as a free gift. Its price was the death of God's dear Son.
Let us not deny God His right to be gracious!
The Intimate
Connection Between
Justification and Sanctification
The Reformer John Calvin, though he rejected the Roman Catholic confusion
of justification and sanctification,[1] nevertheless took the
position that they were "constantly conjoined." He used the illustration
of the light and heat from the sun: Although one can clearly distinguish
between them, one cannot separate them! Nor can justification and the
renewal process be separated. Calvin wrote: "There is no dispute as to
whether or not Christ sanctifies all whom He justifies. It were to rend
the gospel, and divide Christ Himself, to attempt to separate the righteousness
which we receive by faith from repentance."[2] In this view
the other Reformers concur.[3]
That justification is a dynamic experience, involving
renewal, and therefore inseparably linked to sanctification, seems to
be the position of Ellen White: "Forgiveness has a broader meaning than
many suppose. . . . God's forgiveness is not merely a judicial act by
which He sets us free from condemnation. It is not only forgiveness for
sin, but reclaiming from sin. It is the outflow of redeeming
love that transforms the heart. David had the true conception of forgiveness
when he prayed, 'Create in me a clean heart, O God'" (Thoughts From
the Mount of Blessing, p. 114, emphasis in original).
If we understand "forgiveness" in this context as a
synonym of justification, then it becomes evident that Ellen White saw
the restoration of a right relationship with God (justification) as more
than merely a legal arrangement. For her, it was a dynamic, life-changing,
living experience. This means that sanctification, though not identical
to justification, is firmly embedded in that experience. One cannot be
justified without simultaneously beginning the new life. A birth
takes place, with all the elements that belong to living: desires, decisions,
goals, purposes. Nevertheless, a complete lifetime stretches out before
the babe in Christ, and with it, unending opportunities for growth.
And as this growth in Christ proceeds, it is continually
covered by the justification experience. This means we never grow outside
of Christ. Throughout the process, we are covered by the merits of Christ's
righteousness.
The Old Testament word qadesh has basically
two meanings: First, it means "to belong to God"-in reference
to men, things, days, laws, etc. Israel was holy because God had separated
her from the surrounding nations as a special people to Him. The sacrifices
were holy; and so were the sanctuary, the Sabbath, and the Ten Commandments.
Second, the word had also a moral/ethical meaning:
"Consecrate yourselves and be holy, because I am holy" (Lev 11:44). This
means that those who are to stand in God's presence were to have "clean
hands and a pure heart" (Ps 24:4).
In the New Testament, hagios carries the basic
meaning of Old Testament qadesh, though here the moral/ethical
meaning is far more prominent. But here also we find the idea of a people
being holy because they belong to God (1 Peter 2:9; Rom 9-11).
Emphasis on
Holy Living
Paul placed strong emphasis on the concept
of a holy people. God's saints are to be "holy in his sight, without blemish
and free from accusation," continuing in "faith, established and firm"
(Col 1:22, 23; cf. Eph 5:27). This theme of a new life unto God he pursues
vigorously in Romans 6. Here he makes the point that the genuineness of
our faith proves itself in obedience to God and in presenting our members
as "slaves to righteousness." Previously held in "slavery to impurity
and to ever- increasing wickedness," we are now in "slavery to righteousness
leading to holiness" (verses18, 19). "Now that you have been set free
from sin and have become slaves to God, the benefit you reap leads to
holiness, and the result is eternal life" (verse 22).
In fact, throughout Romans 6 the apostle emphasizes
this new obedience. His argument: "You belong to God. Then live as unto
God! You have been born a new creature. Then live the life of a new creation."
In Paul's approach, the indicative of justification is always
followed by the imperative of the life of faith that emerges
from it. Herein lies the ethical character of righteousness.
To be born, then, is not a goal in itself. Rather,
we receive the opportunity to live. We are acquitted in order to live
a life of freedom and purity for God and with God, now and eternally.
With this newness in Christ there comes a tremendous
sense of freedom. Freedom from guilt. But there is also a freedom
with respect to sin itself; not in the sense that sin-or the
defeats that accompany it-is gone, but a freedom from the compulsion
to sin. We are free from the attractiveness of sin. The way of sin no
longer brings that prurient fulfillment it once did. Wrote Ellen White:
"When we are clothed with the righteousness of Christ, we shall have no
relish for sin; for Christ will be working with us. We may make mistakes,
but we will hate the sin that caused the sufferings of the Son of God"
(Selected Messages, Book 1, p. 360).
This is what it means to live "according to the Spirit"
(Rom 8:4). This is the state of the person who has given himself wholly
to Jesus Christ.
So Why the
Continuing Struggle?
This powerful assurance notwithstanding, there
is still an ongoing struggle with sin and waywardness. Why? Does it suggest
that my relationship with God is not what I thought it was? that I am
in fact lost, a spiritual failure?
In our zeal for the Lord, we sometimes draw hasty conclusions
that produce needless anxiety and threaten Christian experience. We may
draw encouragement from these statements by Ellen G. White: "The nearer
we come to Jesus, and the more clearly we discern the purity of His character,
the more clearly shall we see the exceeding sinfulness of sin, and the
less shall we feel like exalting ourselves" (The Acts of the Apostles,
p. 561).
And again: "There can be no self-exaltation, no boastful
claim to freedom from sin, on the part of those who walk in the shadow
of Calvary's cross. . . . Those who live nearest to Jesus discern
most clearly the frailty and sinfulness of humanity, and their only hope
is in the merit of a crucified and risen Saviour" (The Great Controversy,
p. 471).
The most important question in life is How do I stand
with God? And of the answer, many sincere and serious Christians are not
sure. We look at our own lives and feel that it is not a pretty sight!
We see a string of failures and shortcomings, and as a consequence our
whole style of Christian living becomes cramped, weighted down with a
feeling of guilt, overwhelmed by a sense of hopelessness and discouragement.
It would be well to read again, thoughtfully, Philippians
3:12-14, where the Inspired Word tells us to learn to forget that which
is behind and reach for that which is ahead-to press on toward
the goal in Christ Jesus. And we should remember that these words come
immediately after Paul has said that the only righteousness worth having
is that which comes from faith in Christ Jesus.
The Divine
Requirement
So what does God expect of His people?
1. A commitment and surrender to Him that is unqualified
and wholehearted. God does not need a people sitting on the fences of
this world, dithering between the world and God, and not knowing really
where they belong. He is seeking men and women who have made up their
minds and who have no intention of turning back on their commitment.
2. A people who keep looking to Christ. That posture
never changes along the way. And then what happens? "By beholding Jesus
we receive a living, expanding principle in the heart, and the Holy Spirit
carries on the work, and the believer advances from grace to grace, and
from strength to strength. . . . He conforms to the image of Christ, until
in spiritual growth he attains unto the measure of the full stature in
Jesus Christ" (Selected Messages, Book 1, p. 395).
3. A people who are firmly established in the knowledge
and practice of Christ's way of life. This is to live the life
of the Spirit. The life of the Spirit, as Paul so eloquently expresses
it in Galatians 5:16, is contrary to the life of our sinful nature. The
fruit of the Spirit is the opposite of the fruits of the flesh. The follower
of Christ is a warrior who never gives up; he will fight the battle against
sin until the Lord returns, for that's how long the battle will last!
Rather than the complete eradication of our sinful
nature, what God offers is the power of the risen Lord, through the ever-present
ministry of the Holy Spirit, to counteract the bent of our sinful nature.
Here is a statement that speaks directly to this point: "The Christian
will feel the promptings of sin, for the flesh lusteth against the Spirit;
but the Spirit striveth against the flesh, keeping up a constant warfare.
Here is where Christ's help is needed. Human weakness becomes united to
divine strength, and faith exclaims, 'Thanks be to God, . . .
[He gives] us the victory through our Lord Jesus Christ' (1 Cor 15:57)"
(The Sanctified Life, pp 92, 93).
Righteousness by faith means to look continually
and exclusively to the risen Lord. Look away, and hope is gone.
The righteousness that Christ offers is not the beginning of some kind
of self-righteousness, self-worthiness, or self-congratulation, but rather
the permanent end to such attitudes. The one who is justified in Christ
lives continually in Him. Herein lies our assurance, our rest, our fulfillment,
security, and victory.
_____________
[1].
At the Council of Trent (1545-1563), the Roman Catholic Church adopted
a blurring of any distinction between justification and sanctification.
Confusing the two, it became easy for Catholics to think in terms of "justification
by degrees," or to conceive of being partly justified.
[2]. John Calvin, "Acts of the Council of Trent, With
the Antidote" (1547), in Tracts and Treatises in Defence of the Reformed
Faith (Grand Rapids; Eerdmans, Pub. Co., 1958), vol. 3, p. 116.
[3]. For an example of Luther's position, see the introduction
to his Commentary on Romans (1522). A sample of Melanchthon's
views may be seen in his Apology of the Augsburg Confession 4,
72, 1531.
Unless otherwise noted, scriptures quoted are from NIV, the Holy Bible, New International Version, copyright © 1973, 1978, International Bible Society. Used by permission of Zondervan Bible Publishers.
Scriptures quoted from NEB are from The New English Bible, copyright © The Delegates of the Oxford University Press and the Syndics of the Cambridge University Press 1961, 1970. Reprinted by permission.
Home | About
Us | Bible Questions | Bible
Studies | Bookshop | Documents | Conferences | En EspaƱol | |
Contact Us
Copyright © 2008
Biblical Research Institute General Conference of Seventh-day Adventists®
ADVENTIST® and SEVENTH-DAY ADVENTIST® are
the registered trademarks of the General Conference of Seventh-day
Adventists®.