| . |
Ángel
Manuel Rodríguez
Could
you tell me the meaning of the word "Armageddon" in Revelation 16:16?
I keep getting
different answers.
You
will continue to hear different opinions, I'm afraid. Sometimes we confront
biblical information
that is ambiguous and subject to several possible interpretations, making
it difficult to interpret the one that expresses for certain what the
biblical author intended to say. In those cases we simply have to examine
the possibilities, identify those that are compatible with the immediate
context, and accept our limitations as interpreters by acknowledging that
lack of information gives us several ways of reading a particular passage.
The meaning of "Armageddon" is one of these situations.
I
will comment briefly on the components of the name, and then on the two
main possible interpretations of it.
1.
Components of the Name: The noun Armageddon, written in Greek as
Harmagedon, designates the place where the forces of evil gather
to fight the Lord. The text states that it is
a Hebrew name. Hence, most interpreters find in the name the combination
of two Hebrew words. The first is har, which in Hebrew means
"mountain, mount." But the second part of the
word, magedon, is the bone of contention. Is there a Hebrew word
that corresponds to the Greek spelling?
2.
Mount of Megiddo: The traditional solution has been to find
in the term magedon a reference to the ancient city of Megiddo
in Israel. The name of that city is spelled in the Greek translation of
the Old Testament as Mageddo (Joshua 17:11) or as Magedon
(2 Chron. 35:22), the same spelling we find in Revelation 16:16.
The same spelling would support this interpretation. The problem is that
we do not find in the Old Testament the noun Megiddo preceded by the term
har ("mountain"). There is no such place as Har-Magedon.
Some
have attempted to partially solve the problem suggesting that "mountain"
refers to the mountain that was in front of the city of Megiddo, namely,
Mount Carmel. That was the mountain on which Elijah confronted the prophets
of Baal and the Lord revealed Himself as the true object of worship. In
context that would mean that Armageddon is Satan's last attempt to become
the sole object of worship on Planet Earth. That function of the name
nicely fits the message
of Revelation, but the explanation of the name itself is far from certain.
3.
Mount of Assembly: The other main possibility is to find in Harmagedon
a reference to Isaiah 14:13, where we find the Hebrew phrase har
moced, usually rendered "mount of assembly." The main
problem here is again a linguistic one. The g of magedon
is absent from moced, as well as the ending on.
The vowels are not exactly the same, but that is not a major problem,
because the Hebrew script did not have vowels. The g is not a
major problem.
Confused?
Let me explain. The raised c in moced represents
a sound absent in English and Greek languages. When writing Hebrew names
the Greeks tended to use the letter gamma (English: g) to represent it.
Therefore, maged could be the way mo ced was
written in Greek. Are you still with me?
What
about the on ending (Armageddon)? It is argued that
the ending was added to the Hebrew word in order to make the noun sound
like a Greek word. Possible, but we cannot be absolutely certain that
John had that in mind when he used the word "Armageddon."
However,
that interpretation of the term nicely fits the context. Isaiah 14:13
describes Lucifer's intention to sit enthroned on the "mount of assembly,"
that is to say, in God's heavenly dwelling, as if he were God. Revelation
uses that language in order to demonstrate that Lucifer has not given
up his plans and that he will try again to occupy God's place on this
planet. The battle of Armageddon is Lucifer's last attempt to occupy the
mount of assembly, to be like God.
Even
though we have two different interpretations of "Armageddon," they both
reach basically the same conclusion concerning the message encoded in
that term. They're both compatible with the message of the book of Revelation.
Therefore, one could chose one over the other and still agree in terms
of its meaning in the book. So please, do not be dogmatic.
2/8/01
Copyright © Biblical Research Institute General Conference of Seventh-day Adventists®
|
. |